Monday, May 30, 2005

Books, Films, Media Reviews--Robert Kaplan and the Importance of Hard Truths Spring 05

Stubborn Reality

"To know the worst is not always to be liberated from its consequences; nevertheless it is preferable to ignorance." Isaiah Berlin, The Originality of Machiavelli

I can't think of a quote that captures Robert Kaplan's journalistic genius better. Or his potential importance for correcting the way Americans view themselves and the world.

Lots of us probably read Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince back in college. To this day the adjective "Machiavellian" means "coldly realistic" for most educated people in America and in the west.

I've been reading Kaplan for years and I'd encourage you to take a look at his work. I think his kind of realism is pretty important right now.

He writes regular pieces for The Atlantic Monthly and he's published a series of fascinating and best selling "travel and foreign policy" books.

His book titles include:

Soldiers of God--a report from among the mujahidin in Afghanistan during their war against the Russians. He predicted what was to come after that war when almost nobody else got it

The Ends of the Earth--an intimate journey among "the least" from West Africa to South East Asia

Eastward to Tartary--a trip through the Balkans, the Middle East, and the Caucasus--basically, the deeply troubled modern remains of the fallen Ottoman (Turkish) Empire

The Coming Anarchy--a pretty accurate prophetic vision so far of the post Cold War world

An Empire Wilderness--a look at America's transition from nation-state to a new kind of empire, a process that Kaplan thinks is well underway and inevitable

How to sum up Kaplan's writings? If the publishers of the Rough Guide asked Machiavelli himself to write a series of travel guides about some of the most desperate parts of the current developing world, you'd probably get something like Kaplan's books and articles.

His stuff is unflinchingly real, detailed and intimate. I've learned more about the developing world from Kaplan than from any other writer or journalist.

No one who reads him regularly is surprised by the course of the war in Iraq over the past couple of years.

And he's just as honest about the west and the US. He has little patience for Americans (including some of our most significant politicians) who insist on seeing the US and the rest of the world through sentimental and traditional American ideological lenses.

His most recent AM piece described the indigenous proxy armies the US military is training in Africa and throughout the developing world. Those local extensions of American power will play a key role in bolstering America's relatively new imperial role.

He's fun to read and different because he's no leftist railing against American empire and he's even less of a sentimental conservative nationalist who refuses to acknowledge the obvious reality of American imperial power in the world.

He does his best to describe things the way they are and then lets the chips fall where they may.


I'd describe his worldview as a kind of "high paganism." He has a frankly realistic and tragic sensibility. His perspective isn't fatalistic, and he is sometimes surprisingly hopeful given his regular subject matter, but he knows in a deep way that life for most of the world's people is brutal and unfair and without a lot of happy endings. The title of his very first book, Surrender or Starve, pretty much sums up the kinds of choices he believes many poor folks face in the worst parts of the developing world.

Why is his writing and journalism important? To answer that I return to Isaiah Berlin's quote. Even though knowing the worst doesn't always free you from the consequences, sometimes it does.

His clear eyed view of some of the most intractable problems and some of the most challenging situations around the world offer the possibility of addressing those challenges in a realistic and pro-active way. Westerners and Americans have little real idea of what life is like for most of the world's population. Romantic and sentimental images won't create effective solutions. That much is certain.

And when Americans operate out of self-delusional images about themselves (i.e., "We're the most generous nation on earth and we're a peace loving republic that has no interest in imposing our will on other people) there's much less chance to respond in a practical and life giving way to the concrete realities that most folks around the world recognize.

Kaplan's kind of realism could be the start of a better and more realistic theology, mission, and public witness for American Christians. We have a hope for transformation that Kaplan's neo-paganism doesn't, but many of us could probably learn something from his courageous willingness to look at things more honestly than most people do.

I've often prayed that God would raise up a Charles Dickens for the 21st century. Someone who would be a realistic and artistic voice for the masses of the urban poor and the dispossessed around the world.

No sign of anyone or anything like that on the horizon. While we're waiting, there's no reason why someone like Robert Kaplan can't help us get a little closer to true.

"...it appears to me more appropriate to follow up on the real truth of a matter than the imagination of it..." Machiavelli, The Prince

Books, Films, Media Reviews--Best Media Sources Spring 05


Being Present

Last summer I asked some of you to tell me about your reading habits. I was looking for the kinds of weekly and monthly publications you like.

Lots of you responded and I got more feedback than I asked for with many of you making recommendations for online sources and television shows and radio programs.

After taking a look at people’s responses, I realized I’d asked the wrong question. Most of you obviously thought I was asking for your favorite sources of current events and information.

At the end of the 19th century, lots of religious people worried that the regular daily habit of reading newspapers would divert people’s attention from the kinds of habits--like prayer and bible reading and contemplation--that helped folks concentrate on eternal things. They thought that focusing on the stream of current events and experiences would blunt people’s abilities to get with the deeper spiritual currents flowing just a little bit beneath the choppy surface.

As it turned out, they had good reason to be concerned.

But I also think it’s pretty hard to make sense of eternal things without participating seriously in the moment. There are lots of ways to do that. One of them is to keep up with what’s going on and to be a part of the larger conversation of thoughtful people in the country and the world.

“Real theology springs from a bible in your right hand and the daily newspaper in the left.” That’s a paraphrase of a statement by Karl Barth, one of the very few significant evangelical theologians from the last century.

Here are some resources that may help you get “the moment” into your left hand and might encourage you to get into the discussion and into the creation of some theologies and missions and ways of doing “church” that make sense for today.

The Recommendations

I’ve broken your picks down into the categories of periodicals and newspapers, online sources, television shows and radio programs.

I’ve also shaped it into popular choices--three or more people recommended the source—and less popular choices—less than three people recommended the source. The less popular choices are some of the most interesting and fun possibilities. The editorial comments are mostly your words though I’ve taken the liberty of editing and adding when it seemed appropriate.

Nobody mentioned blogs as a source of serious input. I’m pretty surprised by that, though I know that blogs at this state in their development are mostly intensely personal and only occasionally ready for a wider readership. None of you seemed willing to recommend any during this first round. If you’ve got recommendations I’d love to check them out.

Popular Periodicals

Daily

LA Times—The best paper west of the Rockies
NY Times—The best paper east of the Rockies
Wall Street Journal—Very conservative and strongly pro-business paper read across the nation. The best place to get a fix on power and money in America .

Weekly

The Economist--The best news/analysis weekly around the world
Newsweek--One of the two leading American news weeklies

Monthly

The Atlantic Monthly--In-depth cultural and political analysis
Sojourners--Progressive, justice oriented Christian take
Prism--Progressive, justice oriented Christian take
Scientific American--Serious and interesting science for lay people
Christianity Today--Conservative, traditional Christian take on current events in the church and the world

Less Popular Periodicals

Harvard Business Review--Cutting edge business practice
Harvard Technology Review--Cutting edge technology
The New Republic--Leading progressive monthly
National Review--Leading conservative monthly
Outside--Leading x-sports monthly
MIT Technology Review--Cutting edge technology
Discover--Serious and interesting science for laypeople
Fortune—Investing and getting wealthy
Time--The other American news weekly of record
International Bulletin of Missionary Research--Mission shop talk
Mission Frontiers--Ditto
Missiology: An International Review—Ditto
Evangelical Missions Quarterly—Ditto, though lower quality than the others
Presbyterians Today--It’s comforting to know that the endangered species, Presbyterianicus Suburbianis, continues to roam the earth.
Nature --Serious and interesting science for laypeople
Science--Serious graduate level science
Manhattan Institute—The publication of a conservative think tank. I’ve read a number of issues online after getting the recommendation. It’s one of the more strongly conservative publications I’ve read in quite some time. Sort of the conservative version of “Mother Jones” (see below). Harsh and extreme, but there is important truth to be found even among folks you wouldn’t want to hang out with. Sometimes, especially among that group.
PC Magazine--You get the idea…
InfoWorld--Web, internet rag
eWeek--Web, internet rag
Philosophical Review--Reviews of current philosophical writing
Skeptical Inquirer--Debunks ufo, urban legend, spiritualism,
Free Inquiry--Rational inquiry against superstition
First Things—Insightful Catholic take on culture, politics
Foreign Affairs Journal--Foreign affairs by policy makers
Cooks Illustrated --Yes, it’s about the empirical method of cooking, for all of you skeptical and mathematical chefs who like to count.
Utne Reader—Uber-funky, progressive alternative to Reader’s Digest
Mother Jones—In your face, far left, take no prisoners and brook no disagreements view on culture and politics. Really the only left wing publication that faithfully follows the current right wing conservative, Karl Rove inspired recipe of motivating the red meat base with extremist arguments and ridiculing those who think differently. The striking difference is that Mother Jones is a fringe publication while its counterparts now run the country.
Brookings-Metropolitan Policy Program--Urban policy journal
Urban Institute--Urban policy journal

Popular Online Sources

BBC International www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice--Comprehensive world news
The Economist Online http://www.economist.com/--Comprehensive world news
CNN Online http://www.cnn.com/--Comprehensive world news
National Public Radio Online (especially “All Things Considered,” “Fresh Air,” “The Motley Fool,” “This American Life,” “Justice Talking”) http://www.npr.org/ --Thoughtful, intelligent takes on American life, world news
N.Y. Times Online http://www.nytimes.com/--Online version of the slim, grey lady
L.A. Times Online http://www.latimes.com/--Online version of the heavy multi-colored lady
The Onion http://www.theonion.com/--Satirical take on national and world news
Al Jazeera Online http://www.aljazeera.com/home.asp--And now for something completely different

Less Popular Online Sources

The Straight Dope http://www.straightdope.com/--Satirical take on trivia
SlashDot.com http://www.slashdot.com/--News for nerds, strong Linux and Mac leanings, which for those of you who are mostly ignorant of the IT loop—like myself--means that these guys help stoke the resistance to the Microsoft empire. Nerds of the world integrate!
Slate http://www.slate.com--/ Progressive e-zine with great writing and an alternative point of view

Popular TV Sources

CNN News--Moderate, comprehensive world news
The Daily Show--Hilarious, moderate to liberal satire on current news at Comedy Central. According to many sources, this is the main place people under 25 get their news
Charley Rose Show--Influential PBS interview show about news, culture, science, and literature
PBS--In general, some of the best quality television no matter where you live

Less Popular TV Sources

Fox News--The number one “news” source in America. The Fox Network puts out the trashiest programming on network television by far, but their news (read “entertainment”) division is the darling of the conservative right.

It’s the moral values, stupid! WWJD?

He’d watch Fox News, of course.

Popular Radio Sources

National Public Radio

“All Things Considered” (wide ranging news and cultural topics)

“Fresh Air” (brilliant interviews, important conventional and unconventional topics)

“The Motley Fool” (funny and canny investment advice)

“This American Life” (snapshot stories of remarkable Americans)

“Justice Talking” (wide ranging and unusually fair discussions of justice issues)

All in all, thoughtful, intelligent takes on American life, national and world news

My Own Recommendations and Non-Recommendations

Here are my own takes with some explanation on why I chose ‘em and—in a couple of cases-- why I didn’t. I’ve left out sources—like eccentric mission journals and x-sports journals—which probably wouldn’t interest most of you.

What I Read

Weekly

The Economist—In my mind it’s the top source of political, economic, and cultural news in the English speaking print world. Don’t be put off by the title—only a small part of it is devoted to economic analysis and business news. It’s British and the editors are clearly committed to a western agenda of democracy and free trade, but in the more reasonable European way rather than the goofy and misplaced religious intensity of current American politicians and free traders. Exceptional and balanced reporting which tends toward more conservative and libertarian positions. Some of the best and clearest writing you’ll find. Also has a real sense of humor. I wish there was a progressive weekly as well done as The Economist.

It’s the model for the kind of fair, potentially life-giving and healthy conservative approach that many Republicans I know wish their party stood for rather than the version currently in power.

Newsweek--There was a time when American news weeklies were really good. Now it’s mostly infotainment with the emphasis on tainment. Newsweek is probably the best of what remains. At times good investigative journalism and a relatively painless way to get a feel for what a broader spectrum of Americans are thinking about.

Westword--Westword is a fairly typical urban alternative weekly—good and eccentric news and cultural coverage and analysis, events and what’s what around Denver and the Front Range , etc. Most large urban areas in the U.S. have a weekly like it. Good way to stay in touch with local stuff.

Monthly

The Atlantic Monthly--Edited for people who like their news analysis in depth and are in no particular hurry—basically, old school top quality journalism. And it publishes fine fiction and poetry too. In my view, The Economist and The Atlantic Monthly are the two indispensable sources of news and analysis for thoughtful people in the U.S. today. The first leans slightly to the right, the second slightly to the left, but both do a good job of being fair—The Atlantic publishes the best American writers and observers regardless of their point of view or slant.

Scientific American--SA is probably the layman’s best tool for keeping up with what’s going on in science and technology. Since science and technology shape western culture decisively, it’s important to stay somewhat current with the thinking and development in these areas. Doing theology--for example--without a reasonable understanding of the basics of current science and technology will produce theologies and ministry approaches that are mostly nostalgic and escapist visions rather than life-giving takes on the kinds of forces and ideas that are actually shaping most people’s lives.

The New Republic and The National Review--I often read both for a kind of cultural point/counterpoint.

The New Republic is unapologetically liberal but doesn’t have the goofy stridency of some “alternative” liberal mags like Mother Jones. Right now most of the writers are recovering from their disappointment--along with 48% of the American voting public and 85% of the rest of the world. Give them 6-12 months to adjust and they’ll get back at it with helpful stuff.

It’s a good place right now to listen to people who have good and potentially transformative ideas while they struggle with their very human tendency to resist ideological and personal change and admit their shortcomings. I guess that’s true on the conservative side of the aisle as well.

The National Review is generally well written and is sometimes interesting. It represents the way conservative Republicans tend to think.

As a 7 year old I campaigned for the then libertarian Republicans with my mom in the S.F. Bay Area by handing out cans of orange soda labeled “Goldwater” during the ’64 presidential campaign against Lyndon Johnson. We were trying to defeat the crazy immoral liberals who were about to end legal racial segregation and deepen our involvement in Vietnam. So I grew up reading the National Review.

As a young man I revered William F. Buckley, who founded the magazine, because of his willingness to calmly and reasonably challenge arrogant and established ways of thinking. I guess in my zeal for change, I missed how arrogant and narrow-minded he really was. While the gross incivility and unfairness of most current conservative discourse is not his legacy in any way, I’m realizing how much the arrogant tone of the current conservative world truly is.

Given the ascendancy of the current version of the Republican Party I don’t have much confidence we’ll see any important changes in the tone or the magazine in the short run. That’s a shame in the truest sense of that word. But in spite of all that, this is still probably the best place to get a feel for what conservatives are thinking and feeling.

I say all this because I actually have great respect for more traditional conservative thought and wonder how it got so off track. I guess the lust for power degrades everything it touches.

Prism and Sojourners

Well done magazines for “progressive” and “moderate” evangelicals.

I appreciate the emotional, spiritual and editorial honesty in the writing at Sojourners.

At one point many years ago I cancelled my subscription to Sojourners because the tone seemed too angry to me and I couldn’t read it and keep an emotional balance.

But as I’ve gotten older and had more experience with the kinds of gross injustices that are so common around the world, I’ve become more receptive to those who are angry about injustice, and I’ve learned how to balance those feelings better in my faith life. And during the past 15 years or so I think the folks writing Sojourners have grown wiser and learned more about grace and patience.

Prism isn’t as well written or engaging as Sojourners, but it’s a good model of a healthy, thoughtful and balanced alternative to the kind of far right, conservative and simple-minded thought that informs and shapes the vast majority of evangelical and fundamentalist churches these days. If the majority of American evangelicals read this magazine on a regular basis—and had more humble and honest political encouragement from their spiritual leaders--the tenor of our evangelical and national political culture might change for the better.

What I No Longer Read Much

Christianity Today—Some of my friends subscribe to Christianity Today and keep it in their bathrooms. I occasionally read an article or two if nothing else is available in that intimate part of their homes where the plumbing is often more useful than the publications.

Wall Street Journal—Money makes the world go around. Money is the root of all evil. It’s possible to believe both of those statements at the same time. The key is which one you accent. I don’t think a person who emphasizes the second interpretation can read this paper or its editorials regularly and stay true to any kind of Kingdom perspective without unusual spiritual discipline and insight.

Online

I get almost all of my timely news online. I go to my favorite sites in this order:

LA Times Online http://www.latimes.com/ Definitely a homer pick, but in my travels and experience there are probably only two memorable newspapers in the country—the LA Times and the NY Times. The editing is sometimes too lax and the articles too long in the LAT, but it’s good, solid and sometimes creative journalism. Reading the local papers here in Denver can be a numbing if eye-opening experience. I think a good bit of the country deals with that kind of half-baked newspaper quality every day. I read the LA Times online as often as I can.

BBC International www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice Excellent international coverage that is sympathetic to western and American concerns but lacks the Amero-centric views of most U.S. News outlets.

At the BBC one dead American is worth about three dead Iraqis, unlike the time-tested (and current) imperial ratio of one American for every 15-20 of those unfortunate people who are abstract, collateral damage. It falls far short of the prophetic mathematics of the Kingdom of God, but I still like the BBC ratios better than the alternatives.

CNN Online http://www.cnn.com/ Not as willing as Fox to turn news into entertaining propaganda in order to get better ratings. That may seem like damning with faint praise, but in these days of evolved spin you take what you can get.

CNN is a pretty solid news outlet by current standards.

Al Jazeera Online http://www.aljazeera.com/home.asp Infuriating and moving. If we’re going to humiliate and kill lots of these camel jockeys and towel heads who are enemies of all that is good, we may as well get to know them from their very different point of view.

The Onion http://www.theonion.com/ Can be very funny, if often more than a little sophomoric. They recently had a satirical article about the ridiculously overdone funeral for Ronald Reagan that described the building of a pyramid in his honor and the ceremonies marking his passage with Ra, the Egyptian Sun God, into the afterlife that was hilarious. That should give you some idea of the tenor and tone.

Remember, it’s satire. That’s the kind of writing that exaggerates the weaknesses of a particular point of view in order to make people laugh and make a point at the same time. Please forgive me, but many people seem to have forgotten this kind of distinction in their grim and literal drive to control the culture.

The CIA Fact Book http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/

The Fact Book presents very up-to-the-minute accounts of every country in the world, which is very useful to me on a regular basis. If you want to learn about a country or a region, this is the best place to start.

Hey, Hey, what can I say…I consult the CIA! Do you think that phrase, in the form of a chant, would ever catch on among far right Republican protesters…?

Of course, given the CIA’s recent track record--caught by surprise by the fall of the Soviet Union and 9/11, and serving up bad intelligence on Iraq which simply confirmed the desires of our current political masters--maybe this isn’t a site you’d want to bet the farm on.

But in the work I do--which doesn’t include doctrines of unilateral, pre-emptive violence--the very human and limited competency of the CIA is good enough and helpful. The way you judge something depends on the standards required.

Radio

Like most people, I only listen to radio while I’m driving. I like National Public Radio, music and sports in that order.

There are so many excellent NPR shows that it’s hard to choose among them. See the ”Popular Radio Sources” above for some of my favorites.

I’m also partial to Car Talk and Prairie Home Companion

CT may be the weirdest show on radio—the hosts are two goofy post-middle aged brothers with thick east coast accents who give callers advice about various car problems. They also tell bad jokes and silly riddles. I have no interest in cars at all but I love this show for reasons that are buried deep in some inaccessible part of my brain.

I also have a friend who loves Janet Jackson’s music. The weird attraction of some things—like CT and Janet Jackson--is inexplicable and humbling.

Many of you have probably listened to PHC at one time or another. Garrison Keillor, who hosts this truly original variety show based in St. Paul, MN, is the closest thing to Will Rodgers or Mark Twain on the market today. You can hardly claim to be an American if you haven’t listened to this show at least once.

I’ve found I can't listen to conservative talk and news radio very long because the tone is normally so harsh that it gets on my nerves. That’s an approach that elects presidents and administrations these days, so call me old fashioned. But I prefer NPR. They do the news and analysis as if they're communicating with adults rather than lecturing frightened, self-righteous children.

On the other hand, you’ll have to put up with the persistent NPR style, which can be annoyingly soft-spoken and abstract. They sometimes seem to be trying too hard to show that they’re gentle, intelligent and free-thinking souls. The music in the interludes and introductions is almost all improvisational jazz, which adds to the “we’re so free” but possibly “too-low-key” and “out-of-touch” approach.

Conservative radio has learned that it’s ok to play some rock music and try to be a little more contemporary in their attempts at entertaining and influencing people. NPR sometimes seems like the Amish of the media world. They could learn a few things from the culturally conservative part of the frequency.

Television

I watch very little television, so I’m probably not the best guide in this area. I haven’t seen a single episode of Seinfeld or Friends—you know when whole TV empires have arisen and fallen without you ever laying eyes on them you’re living in a parallel universe.

Some folks feel like television is a wasteland. I don’t feel that way. I’ve seen a lot of great stuff, particularly on cable. I just feel there are a number of other ways to spend time that are more rewarding.

When I do watch the tube, I often watch sports. Janet refers to the non-sports shows I like as “Nazi/Shark/Comedian” programming on the double digit and triple digit cable channels. Or in other words, history, nature and comedy shows on outlets like PBS, Discovery, National Geographic, Science Channel, History Channel, Comedy Central, etc. You get the idea.

Some specific shows that I really like:

The Daily Show-- It makes me laugh out loud regularly, and there aren’t too many things I can say that about. Political and cultural satire that makes you feel like someone is awake at the wheel and has a sense of humor.
The Charley Rose Show—The best news, arts, and culture interview show I’ve seen. Unfortunately, it’s on late at night on PBS. Simple and very direct conversation around a table. Just people with their own thoughts talking to each other in an always civil, creative, and encouraging way.

Thursday, May 19, 2005

Faith, Culture and Politics: A Pope Points the Way? Spring 05


Life Giving Politics

For the past few years I've been trying to identify--in a more intentional way--an American Christian political and social ethic that makes more sense to me than the same old same old stuff from the loudest voices in the current arena.

Recognizing the weaknesses of various social and political points of view is an important starting place. But criticism is only half the task in creating something more life giving. At some point thoughtful Christians who aren't with the current program have to offer a clear alternative.

The fastest growing segments of the conservative protestant church in the US have largely abandoned an authentically prophetic role in the political and social arena.

Christians who want to change that situation can't just complain. We've got to create a compelling alternative vision that we can take into churches and into the national public policy discussion.

A lot of folks are working on that challenge right now.

I was encouraged by the publication of "Toward an Evangelical Public Policy, " the NAE's (National Association of Evangelicals) recent statement on Christian social and political action. You can get it at Amazon.

They pointed out that racial reconciliation, economic justice and environmental conservation are just as important as "family values" and opposition to abortion.

I don't know how much influence their statement will have in the wider evangelical and fundamentalist world. Fear makes listening difficult.

Yet sometimes words do more than we might think in a dark moment. Words created the world.
Words and practical witness are even better.

I think the life and witness of John Paul 2 might turn out to be a pretty good starting place for a new kind of social and political thinking among American evangelicals.

A Consistent Witness

During my college days I was a regular columnist for the Stanford Daily. I recently dug out a column I wrote about the newly elected Pope John Paul 2 way back in 1979.

As I re-read the column for the first time in 26 years (wow, was it really that long ago...?) and then reflected on the recent obituaries written after his death, I was pretty struck by the remarkable consistency of John Paul 2's social ethics and teachings throughout his life.

JP2 influenced me a lot over the years and I wanted to highlight some of his most important potential contributions to the current American conservative Christian protestant debate on social policy.

Is there a debate? Let's pretend.

A Compelling Christian Social Vision
  • Prophetic Independence

JP2 refused to identify Christian faith with particular political, social or economic movements. He challenged western democratic culture and capitalism as clearly as he questioned communism and authoritarian regimes. The gospel must cut through any accumulation of power at strange and uncomfortable angles. He understood that truth more than most.

  • Individual Freedom and Social Solidarity

He thought that a creative combination of individual freedom and social solidarity was a biblical mandate for healthy cultures in a fallen world.

Some cultures do social solidarity at the expense of individual freedom. Other cultures do individual freedom at the expense of social solidarity. He challenged traditional cultures to increase individual freedom and challenged developed western cultures to increase social solidarity.

He believed that current western cultures--particularly America--support individual freedom in a way that threatens social solidarity. In particular, he felt that an extreme and ideological committment to competitive individualism within western capitalism threatens social fairness in the west and around the world.

When he was still Archbishop of Krakow he wrote "The Acting Person," a major Catholic philosophical work. He argued that people only become fully human in the act of individual ethical choice. In the tentative and non-ideological way that is appropriate for Christians, he supported the world's experiments in political democracy and economic systems that put more power into the hands of individuals and families.

But he also believed that God calls individuals to make "a radical committment to justice and a determined display of social solidarity." He meant, among other things, that Christians should place a very high priority on serving the poor and the dispossessed. He also thought that Christians were commissioned to hold societies accountable to protect and encourage those who are currently "weak" in economic or cultural terms.

  • A More Biblically Consistent Ethic of Life

JP2 thought that current American social movements support certain biblical ethics while ignoring other important Christian social teachings.

His social thought makes little sense in the current American conservative protestant world. And it makes even less sense in the broader American political community.

He was trying to construct a consistent ethic of life. He wanted to support and protect human life and dignity wherever it was threatened and he worked to counter "the arrogance of power with reason, force with dialogue, pointed weapons with outstretched hands, evil with good."

Here are some of the more important specific elements of his possibly life giving social ethic:

Opposition to Abortion

Support for Economic Justice and a Priority on Serving the Poor

Support for More Traditional Sexual Morality and Reproductive Responsibility

Opposition to Capital Punishment

Support for the Integrity of the Family

Support for Human Rights Including Religious Freedom

Opposition to War and Coercive Violence

Support for Ethnic and Racial Reconciliation

Support for Strong Environmental Conservation

JP2's social teachings don't fit anywhere on the current American "left/right" dichotomy. That's easy to see at a glance.

The Potential Relevance of JP2

I don't agree with every element of John Paul's social teaching and his words were clearly better than his follow through. I guess that last part is pretty true of everybody, though.

But if his teaching represents a clearer picture of truly biblical social ethics it could be important.

An approach like his might help American conservative protestants regain a biblical credibility and honesty in the current political and social discussion in the US.

That would be good. And timely.